6.4
77.8 %
97.3 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 77.8%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 3.0 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 25.2 | 81.0% | 1.0 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.3 | NA | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50.0% | 0.5 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 6.1 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 26.7 | 74.8% | 1.0 |
| Chapter in book | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.2 | NA | 0.2 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 10 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 11 | 72 | 81.9% | 1 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 15 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 63 | 77.8% | 1 |
| Chapter in book | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 6.2 | 12.8 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 47.2% |
| 2015 | 5.3 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 47.3% |
| 2016 | 6.4 | 9.2 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 47.4% |
| 2017 | 9.0 | 17.7 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 42.9% |
| 2018 | 6.8 | 9.4 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 47.9% |
| Total | 33.7 | 58.2 | 1.7 | 15.6 | 46.2% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 8.4 | 0.87 | 0.9 | 11.3% |
| 2015-2017 | 10.8 | 0.64 | 0.7 | 6.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 12.9 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 4.5% |
| 2017-2019 | 9.3 | 0.54 | 0.3 | 3.2% |
| Total | 17.7 | 0.69 | 1.2 | 7.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 15 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 67.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 23 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 78.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 8.4 | 1.23 | 2.9 | 34.2% |
| 2015-2017 | 10.8 | 1.35 | 4.6 | 42.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 12.9 | 1.43 | 6.3 | 48.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 9.3 | 1.47 | 4.7 | 50.9% |
| 2018-2020 | 7.1 | 1.46 | 3.8 | 53.3% |
| Total | 20.4 | 1.36 | 9.0 | 44.1% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 64.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 23 | 2 | 8.7% | 15 | 65.2% |
| 2015-2017 | 29 | 3 | 10.3% | 19 | 65.5% |
| 2016-2018 | 35 | 3 | 8.6% | 23 | 65.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 28 | 3 | 10.7% | 18 | 64.3% |
| 2018-2020 | 22 | 2 | 9.1% | 13 | 59.1% |
| Total | 59 | 6 | 10.2% | 38 | 64.4% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 68.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 52 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.1 |
| United States | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 |
| Luxembourg | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| Italy | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Australia | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Greece | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University | China | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.8 |
| Chinese Academy of Sciences | Institute | China | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| Harbin Institute of Technology | University | China | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 |
| RaySearch Laboratories | Company | Sweden | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 |
| Lund University | University | Sweden | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 |
| University of Luxembourg | University | Luxembourg | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| Ministry of Education | Other Public | China | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| University of Florida | University | United States | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Bitynamics AB | Company | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| University of California, Irvine | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| University of Padova | University | Italy | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Hebei University of Technology (HEBUT) | University | China | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Wuhan University of Technology | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Qingdao University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| South China University of Technology | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Uppsala University | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Victoria University Wellington | University | New Zealand | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Harvard University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Linköping University | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Teleopti Tem AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Peloponnese | University | Greece | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Ericsson | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Sophia University | University | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of California, San Diego | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Australian National University | University | Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Chalmers University of Technology | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Sydney | University | Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Washington University in St. Louis | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Elekta AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of New South Wales | University | Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Zaragoza | University | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| East China University of Science and Technology | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| FUDAN UNIVERSITY | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 9.5% |
| 2015 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 27.8% |
| 2016 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 31.2% |
| 2017 | 24 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 21 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 66.7% |
| 2019 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 2020 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Total | 132 | 54 | 1 | 10 | 42 | 1 | 78 | 40.9% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 8.3 | 62.6 | 7.5 | 3.2 | 38.9% |
| 2015 | 6.5 | 38.2 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 12.8% |
| 2016 | 6.6 | 41.1 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 13.8% |
| 2017 | 8.7 | 36.1 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 13.8% |
| 2018 | 8.1 | 18.1 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 37.0% |
| 2019 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 50.6% |
| 2020 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 63.0% |
| Total | 50.8 | 209.3 | 4.1 | 16.3 | 32.1% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 18.8 | 1.00 | 1.8 | 9.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 20.8 | 0.79 | 1.7 | 8.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 19.3 | 0.72 | 1.2 | 6.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 17.6 | 0.62 | 0.5 | 2.8% |
| Total | 36.4 | 0.82 | 2.3 | 6.3% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 56 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 95.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 14.0 | 1.32 | 6.3 | 45.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 13.3 | 1.62 | 7.8 | 58.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 16.3 | 1.77 | 10.5 | 64.5% |
| 2017-2019 | 16.2 | 1.61 | 10.1 | 62.4% |
| 2018-2020 | 16.7 | 1.57 | 9.7 | 58.2% |
| Total | 35.5 | 1.52 | 19.8 | 55.8% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 56 | 1 | 1.8% | 38 | 67.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 56 | 1 | 1.8% | 35 | 62.5% |
| 2016-2018 | 60 | 0 | 0.0% | 38 | 63.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 60 | 0 | 0.0% | 33 | 55.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 52 | 1 | 1.9% | 26 | 50.0% |
| Total | 131 | 2 | 1.5% | 79 | 60.3% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 52 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
